Trump’s national emergency to build his border wall is the most autocratic move of his presidency.
Popular in News & Politics
- Seriously, Congress Has Been Even More Embarrassing Than Usual Lately
- Why Netanyahu’s War Cabinet Is Existentially Divided
- Evidence Is Building That Samuel Alito’s Brain Is Filled to the Brim With Right-Wing Internet Chum
- The DOJ Is Making a Huge Mistake Censoring a Journalist Who Embarrassed Fox News
Donald Trump has now been the president of the United States for two years, and many of the most sensational predictions for his time in office have not come to pass. The press remains rambunctious. Americans aren’t scared to criticize the president. Courts continue to rule against the White House with reassuring regularity. Elections are, as the Democrats’ big victory in the midterm elections strikingly demonstrated, still free. So perhaps those of us who have warned about the president’s authoritarian ambitions really have, as a prominent conservative told me during a recent TV debate, been suffering from a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome all along?
The president’s intention to issue an executive order declaring a national emergency at the southern border suggests otherwise. In fact, it is hard to imagine a clearer piece of evidence that he really does seek unconstitutional powers: If Trump’s past attacks on the legislature and the judiciary have, at times, felt like a drill, his intention to arrogate vast powers to himself under an utterly transparent pretext is the real deal.
Americans often like to imagine that their system of checks and balances is a secure bulwark against the threat of autocracy. But in reality, no set of political institutions is, in and of itself, enough to constrain a popular and power-hungry president intent on destroying the republic. One of the reasons for this is the classic problem of the state of emergency, with which political philosophers and students of the law have grappled ever since the Roman Republic.
As Cicero argued in De Legibus, the safety of the people is the highest law; when a polity faces some unforeseen emergency, there may thus be urgent and legitimate need to loosen some of the ordinary legal restrictions on the powers of the highest magistrate. At the same time, it is obvious that any legal recognition of the need for emergency powers creates a huge opportunity for abuse; if an aspiring autocrat declares a false emergency, he would instantly be liberated from the usual constraints on his power. The history of the 20thcentury demonstrates that this is no abstract concern: From Adolf Hitler in Germany to Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, some of the most brutal dictators of the past hundred years have consolidated their power by exploiting emergency legislation.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Trump’s incompetence should make us all the more concerned about the long-term threat to American democracy.It would be tempting to think that a similar course of action would be impossible in the United States because the Constitution creates such potent limits on the power of the president. But the differences between the powers that American presidents have traditionally exercised during states of emergencies and those granted by the infamous Article 48 of the Constitution of the Weimar Republic are a matter of degree, not of kind. As a recent article in the Atlanticargues, President Trump could “do all kinds of extraordinary things” by declaring a national state of emergency, “from seizing control of the internet to declaring martial law.”
If American democracy has enjoyed astounding longevity, then, it is because two key safeguards have historically ensured that presidents have not arrogated tyrannical powers to themselves. The first is that American citizens have long had a strong commitment to democratic values, which made them very reluctant to vote for candidates who displayed authoritarian tendencies. A few presidents, like Andrew Jackson, have been elected as strongmen with a dubious commitment to the rule of law. Others, like Richard Nixon, have bristled against constraints on their power in the (imagined) privacy of the Oval Office. But the vast majority have not abused emergency powers, or played other forms of extreme “constitutional hardball,” because they had a deep commitment to preserving the republic.
Advertisement AdvertisementThe second is that the president’s counterparts in Congress have, in the past, made it clear that they would stand up to him if he overstepped the constitutional boundaries of the executive in a blatant manner. Perhaps the most impressive instance of this came when Franklin Delano Roosevelt, understandably frustrated by the Supreme Court’s string of rulings against the New Deal, threatened to pack the court; even though he was extremely popular, some of his closest allies in the Senate made clear that they would refuse to confirm his nominees. Though FDR might have tried to pass the same legislation under the pretext of a national emergency, this effectively demonstrated how high a political price he would have had to pay for infringing on the powers traditionally enjoyed by Congress or the Supreme Court—and he mostly desisted from further attempts to undermine other branches of government.
Advertisement AdvertisementThese two key safeguards are now failing. For one, no successful candidate for the highest office in the land has ever attacked the very idea of legitimate political competition as openly and blatantly as Donald Trump. From his call to lock up his chief political opponent to his constant denunciation of independent judges and critical members of Congress, his desire for unconstrained power is in scary evidence.
Advertisement AdvertisementFor another, it is hard to recall a juncture in American history in which the president’s congressional supporters have been so willing to do his bidding. Mitch McConnell is an especially striking study in the dereliction of duty. Over the past weeks, the Senate majority leader has made clear that declaring a state of national emergency over the southern border would constitute an abuse of presidential powers. When, on Thursday, Trump announced his intention to declare a national emergency over—let’s see—the southern border, McConnell immediately vowed his support.
AdvertisementAs I have argued before, the most powerful—as well as the most poorly understood—trick in the populist’s toolkit is the ability to engage in “salami tactics.” When they set out to expand their power, populists usually do so one small slice at a time, issuing false pretexts for executive action and fake reasons for the “reform” of independent institutions. As a result, no single action by the executive seems like an existential threat to the rule of law. Without any clear moment of juncture, the system of checks and balances slowly decays.
What is striking about Trump’s intention to declare a state of emergency for such transparently fraudulent reasons is that he isn’t even bothering to engage in salami tactics. This is about as clear an attack on the constitutional order as political scientists could have dreamed up for some in-class exercise on the rise of dictatorship. If Republican senators like Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse are not willing to stand up to Trump’s cheap power grab now, they never will. And if the president’s many opponents cannot take to the streets to oppose his autocratic tendencies at this juncture, it is clear that they won’t do so until it’s far too late.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementTo be sure, none of this means that Trump is likely to follow in the footsteps of Ferdinand Marcos, or even Viktor Orbán. If there’s one thing that the past two years have demonstrated, it is that Trump lacks the vision or the discipline of most of the authoritarian populists who have successfully bent their countries’ institutions to their will. If there was a populist Olympics, Donald Trump would not make medal rank.
But Trump’s incompetence should make us all the more concerned about the long-term threat to American democracy. An evidently erratic and highly unpopular American president is about to declare a national emergency on grounds that everyone knows to be spurious. And yet, it is likely that he will experience only the mildest blowback from his political allies. What does that tell us about the damage that a shrewd and popular president with the capacity to follow the increasingly sophisticated playbook of authoritarian populism could inflict—especially if he could consolidate his powers under the cover of an actual emergency?
Tweet Share Share Comment-
Best Labor Day headphones deals: Apple, Bose, Beats, and more on sale划重点!广东出台林长制和绿美广东工作考核实施细则29县农林牧渔业产值超百亿,茂名湛江包揽前5名丨数读广东统计年鉴2023二郎山谱写筑路传奇(下)Wordle today: The answer and hints for August 29这项指数被称外贸出口“天气预报”,82家青企入选样本工商银行青岛洛阳路支行用心服务老年客户受赞扬青岛港在全海区首次实现 港作拖轮生活污水回收处理评论丨农事运动会:一场农民的盛会、新农人风采展现的盛会、城乡双向奔赴的盛会29岁小伙不幸重病昏迷,新华保险青岛分公司提前赔付解忧难
- ·13 Places to Find Little Legends and Compact Cryptids
- ·工地安全生产怎么保障?看看他们怎么做
- ·聚焦民生实事 为群众解忧纾困
- ·工商银行青岛洛阳路支行用心服务老年客户受赞扬
- ·广州市白云区供销联社携手6所院校15支队伍,加力提速推进“百千万工程”
- ·部分因降雨断道的国省干道已抢通
- ·青岛港自动化码头在全球港口首次实现陆侧全自动收箱作业
- ·比学赶超争先进 加压奋进促发展
- ·Cheap heat
- ·工地安全生产怎么保障?看看他们怎么做
- ·5月起,山东养老保险单位缴费降至16%
- ·闈掑矝瀛樿捶娆句綑棰濆弻鍙岀獊鐮?.7涓囦嚎鍏冿紝鍏ㄧ渷棣栦釜
- ·夜间献血模式“上线”
- ·开展延时服务 方便广大新人
- ·青岛港自动化码头在全球港口首次实现陆侧全自动收箱作业
- ·速看!第五十届养猪产业大会(广州) 优秀论文征集开始了!
- ·A Journey Into the Mind of Stephen King
- ·绉戝垱鏉垮紑濮嬫帴鍙楃敵璇 涓ユ妸璐ㄩ噺鍏虫垚甯傚満鍏虫敞閲嶇偣
- ·工商银行青岛分行成功解救误入传销客户
- ·累计超500万客户参与,平安RUN“保险+健康”模式获客户青睐
- ·海丰芥蓝入选全国名特优新农产品名录
- ·工商银行青岛洛阳路支行用心服务老年客户受赞扬
- ·隆隆金!这个“双11”,汕尾人忙着“充植”
- ·国家高速列车技术创新中心签约三项目
- ·Microwave technique recovers 87% of batteries' lithium in 15 minutes
- ·我市召开全市个私经济高质量发展试点工作联席会议