The Never Trump voice vote at the GOP convention was really close.
Chaos erupted on the floor of the Quicken Loans Arena earlier today when Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), in his capacity as the convention’s deputy permanent chair, called the assembled delegates to a voice vote. The issue at hand: Whether to accept the party rules drawn up last Friday by the RNC rules committee. Last week, the committee successfully fought off the Never Trump movement’s attempt to alter party rules to allow delegates to vote for the candidate of their choice rather than for the candidate to which they were bound by primary and caucus wins, a long-plotted move calculated to draw pledged delegates away from Donald Trump.
After the rules committee rejected Never Trump delegates’ so-called “conscience clause,” pre-convention reports had all but elegized the GOP holdouts, effectively declaring their effort dead on arrival. But the chorus of cheers, jeers, and boos that accompanied Womack’s call for a voice vote momentarily reinvigorated the movement’s malcontents.
The ayes (for adopting the rules) hollered, the nays (against) groused, and Womack basically cupped his hand to his ear and decided the vote “in the opinion of the chair” went for the ayes—in favor of the rules.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe result was a foregone conclusion. Womack was never going to suffer a serious challenge to Trump’s ascendance—he’d already pooh-poohed a roll call vote that would have required delegates to vote individually for or against party rules.
But just how close did the Never Trump nays get? Slatedid some detective work to find out.
First, the basics: A voice vote essentially consists of screaming as loud as possible when your preferred faction is called. The chorus of ayes meant a vote for the rules. The cacophony of nays meant a vote against the rules in a last-ditch procedural measure to unseat Trump. Since there’s no way of knowing precisely how many are voting aye or nay, a voice vote is decided subjectively based which side seems louder.
AdvertisementTo figure out which bloc really earned the win, Mickey Capper, one of Slate’s podcast producers, ran the audio from the convention through a program called REAPER. The program allowed us to visualize the auditory peaks and troughs that map onto the yells, whoops, and silences of the crowd. Here’s the visual map of the vote that resulted:
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementWe then color-coded the visual to correspond to who was making noise at any given time. Yellow indicates Womack speaking, red signals those voting in favor of the rules shouting “aye,” and blue telegraphs those voting “nay.” The clip begins with Womack’s call to vote, followed by the sound of the ayes. Womack then calls for the nay vote, after which he pronounces the “ayes” the winners. We also included a fourth category, in purple, that corresponds to the reaction of the crowd after Womack called the vote in favor of the rules. The two outlier spikes that occur about 25 seconds into the minute-long clip represent the sound of Womack’s gavel following the “aye” vote.
AdvertisementBased on our analysis, Womack’s ears weren’t wrong: The “ayes” have it.
But they didn’t win by much. REAPER’s comparison of the volume and loudness of the “aye” and the “nay” votes, both visual and measured in decibels, indicates that the vote was close—very close. REAPER registered a 0.5 decibel difference between the peak of the “aye” vote (which, apart from Womack’s gaveling, was the loudest single moment in the clip and clocked in around -5.6 dB) and the peak of the “nay” vote (approximately -6.1 dB). It also registered about a one-decibel difference in sustained loudness between the two votes, with the “aye” votes taking the cake. (For a more comprehensive and technical explanation of what exactly a decibel is and how in the world they can register as negative values, we direct you here and here).
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementMickey interpreted the results of our data to me this way: Even though the “ayes” clearly won, if someone angrily asked you to turn down a too-loud television and you decreased its volume by one decibel, they’d tell you to turn it down again. It’s tough to imagine Womack’s auditory sensitivity was keen enough to detect a substantial difference in volume.
AdvertisementFurthermore, there are other aspects of our audiovisual display that look fishy if Womack’s goal was to appear impartial in calling the vote. It’s clear that Womack allowed the “ayes” to whoop, holler, and exercise in favor of the rules for about 18 seconds—two and a half times as long as he gave nay-voting delegates to do the same. This means Womack cut off “nay” voters before they could enjoy the same second-breath bump in volume that their “aye” counterparts were able to belt out after briefly trailing off around the 12-second mark. Because of the difficulty of picking up on a difference of just one decibel, it’s easy to imagine the question tipping the other way had Womack called for the “nay” vote first.
Nevertheless, the ayes, the RNC rules committee, and, by extension, Trump himself emerged victorious. But only just. The biggest takeaway? Voice voting is a pretty stupid way to figure out anything having to do with who becomes president.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
Abrar Ahmed returns as Pakistan names squad for second Test against BangladeshFinal polls hand good news to Hillary Clinton but battlegrounds still contested.Army chiefs of S. Korea, US discuss countering COVID人大工作要练好学习基本功Value JudgmentVenom stans fight Ted Bundy stans for wanting to f*ck an IRL monsterSeoul warns NK over anti[Photo News] Early voting despite virus fearsNvidia GeForce Now Ultimate vs. New Graphics CardN. Korea tests newly developed solid
- ·21 Unexpected Wonders in Colorado’s Vibrant Cities and Small Towns
- ·Why we binge
- ·9鏈?0鏃ヨ嚦21鏃ラ潚宀涘湴閾?鍙风嚎鍔犲紑鏈哄満鐩磋揪蹇溅 寤堕暱杩愯惀鏃堕棿
- ·Apple really wants you to know that Apple News is dominating
- ·Anatomy of a Keyboard
- ·'Metroid Prime 4' development restarts after two years
- ·龙尾峡隧道贯通 国庆节前形成通车能力
- ·N. Korea increases budget for health, construction projects amid anti
- ·[From the Scene] How ‘world’s first oil town’ is wrestling to become ‘green'
- ·以数据要素乘数效应助力现代农业!“数据要素×”三年行动计划发布
- ·Liverpool face Chelsea test as Manchester clubs enter fray
- ·Alabama secretary of state says more voting would cheapen the work of civil rights heroes.
- ·Arshad Nadeem receives Hilal
- ·Apple really wants you to know that Apple News is dominating
- ·Who’s ahead in early voting?
- ·长江中游或为家鸡起源地
- ·Pragmocracy Now
- ·Conte's Inter on a 'mission' to kill off Juventus domination
- ·The price of Ethereum reaches a new all
- ·音乐与时尚的“邂逅”!无极四重奏专场音乐会精彩上演
- ·广东超一半的北运淡水鱼来自这里!全链发力打响“南海鱼”金字招牌
- ·青岛市2023年绿色出行宣传月和公交出行宣传周系列活动启动
- ·How #NeverTrumpers are reacting to Election Day.
- ·[Photo News] Early voting despite virus fears
- ·Yes, big spiders are spreading in the U.S. No, they're not flying.
- ·Amazon stops selling Echo Wall Clocks
- ·Giant dual
- ·9鏈?0鏃ヨ嚦21鏃ラ潚宀涘湴閾?鍙风嚎鍔犲紑鏈哄満鐩磋揪蹇溅 寤堕暱杩愯惀鏃堕棿
- ·徐峥、吴京等6位导演发起金钥匙创投计划,青岛影视周亮点纷呈
- ·挖重建“精神富矿” 展雅安重建新貌
- ·尝“鲜”盛宴,等你来探!2024年清远西牛麻竹笋尝鲜季即将启幕
- ·Randi Zuckerberg's podcast satirizes Silicon Valley with fairytales
- ·家庭大屏掀起“激光电视热” 超四成用户因健康护眼选购
- ·Facebook is shutting down Moments
- ·Apple Intelligence is now a little easier to get outside the U.S.
- ·Samsung allegedly plans to unveil new Galaxy S smartphones at CES