SCOTUS: The courts implementing Project 2025, without Trump.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court refused to allow a new rule issued by the Department of Education to go into effect and protect trans students under Title IX, which promises equality in education and specifically forbids discrimination “on the basis of sex.” In 2020 the court famously decided, in Bostock v. Clayton County,that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.” The new rule, which is for now blocked from taking effect, has sought to apply this logical conclusion to Title IX’s demand for equality.
However, since the release of Bostock, two central things have changed: the court’s structure and the prospect of former President Donald Trump’s reelection. These developments have inspired a concerted attempt on the right side of the political map to roll back Bostock, and a detailed plan to that effect was included in Project 2025, the 922-page document detailing the blueprint for a Trump administration. Yet, as this month’s decision demonstrates, the groups behind Project 2025 are already executing their plan through the courts in 2024.
Project 2025 directly targets Bostock, arguing that the ruling should not apply to various protections of equality outside its immediate circumstances. “The New Administration,” it states, “should restrict Bostock’s application of sex discrimination protections to sexual orientation and transgender status in the context of hiring and firing.” It further declares that “the President should direct agencies to withdraw unlawful ‘notices’ and ‘guidances’ purporting to apply Bostock’s reasoning broadly outside hiring and firing” and “rescind regulations interpreting sex discrimination provisions as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, sex characteristics, etc.” Without waiting for November’s election, the leaders of Project 2025 are already in courts, rehearsing this part of their playbook in a multifront war against Bostock and LGBTQ+ students, patients, and employees.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementRelated From Slate
Shirin Ali
The Trump Hush Money Trial Judge Is Getting Pretty Tired of This
Read MoreTake the court’s recent 5–4 decision, for example. With the exception of Justice Neil Gorsuch, who penned Bostock, all the other conservative justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, who joined Gorsuch in Bostock, affirmed the blocking of the entire Title IX rule by district courts in Louisiana and Kentucky. This latest ruling is the culmination of a line of cases in which red states and conservative advocacy groups, like the Alliance Defending Freedom, argue that because Bostockwas decided under Title VII to protect employees, it cannot be used to protect LGBTQ+ students under Title IX.
In a similar battlefield focused on health care, red states have attacked Bostock to prevent its reasoning from protecting trans minors’ access to treatments that are available to cisgender adolescents. When the minors, their parents, and supportive doctors sought preliminary injunctions against bans on gender-affirming care, they temporarily won in many district courts that found that the bans were likely unconstitutional by applying Bostock to the equal protection clause’s broad prohibition on discrimination. However, a conservative majority of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6thCircuit lifted those injunctions, holding that Bostockdoes not apply outside Title VII and thus is “irrelevant” to the interpretation of the equal protection clause. The case, L.W. v. Skrmetti, was recently taken up by the Supreme Court and will be heard in its 2024–25 term, probably before any new administration is in place.
Advertisement AdvertisementLikewise, still in the health care trenches, lawsuits have been filed to prevent another of the Biden administration’s rules protecting LGBTQ+ people from going into effect. This rule was set by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the nondiscrimination provision of the Affordable Care Act, demanding—based on Bostock—that medical providers avoid discriminating against LGBTQ+ patients. In response, the ADF, which is one of the chief groups behind Project 2025, launched litigation to block the rule, recently winning nationwide and statewide preliminary injunctions issued on the same day by Mississippi and Florida courts. Again, the prevailing argument was that Bostock had no life outside Title VII.
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- Kamala Harris May Finally Be the Opponent That Makes Donald Trump Fully Lose It
- So Is Donald Trump Jr. Cursed, or What?
- A Global Problem Is Preventing the Wars in Ukraine and Gaza From Coming to an End
- The Trump and Harris Campaigns Are Pivoting to a New Skirmish
Remarkably, a wave of litigation is now rising to castrate Bostock even within Title VII. In this battleground, Project 2025’s exact words matter, and employers are now arguing that they, too, can discriminate as long as they not do that in the narrow context of “hiring and firing.” For example, in Texas, the group leading Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation, attacks (in the courtroom of a far-right judge) Bostock-based guidance to employers by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Similarly, the ADF represents a group called the Christian Employers Alliance, arguing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit that they are allowed to deny employees health care coverage based on their gender identity because deprivation of needed gender-affirming care falls outside “hiring and firing.” And earlier this month, the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11thCircuit agreed to vacate and reconsider en banc its former 2–1 decision that applied Bostock and held that an employer who prevented such care to a transgender employee engaged in unlawful discrimination.
Although candidates on the campaign trail debate the future impact of Project 2025, much of the damage it orders is already happening in a war in the courts that seeks to hollow Bostock of any meaning.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
Where to preElon Musk wants SpaceX to fly you anywhere on Earth in under an hour广东援疆“粤来越运动”系列活动喀什启动,胡明轩担纲首发公益大使Xiaomi to launch Mi Mix 4 one day before Samsung eventApple to start manufacturing iPhone Pro in India, report claims全市法院集中兑付农民工工资200余万元广东援疆“粤来越运动”系列活动喀什启动,胡明轩担纲首发公益大使Kid from 'It' attends 'It' screening dressed as kid from 'It'21 College and University MuseumsKoreas end contact via resumed hotline without agreement on talks
- ·Yoon touts pension reform drive amid stagnant popularity rating
- ·Kid from 'It' attends 'It' screening dressed as kid from 'It'
- ·去年12月我市PPI下跌4.22%
- ·Samsung's Galaxy Watch 4 Series aims for an easy Apple
- ·Garmin Fenix 8 vs. Apple Watch Ultra: The Fenix wins big on battery life
- ·San Juan's mayor isn't happy Republicans canceled a hearing about Hurricane Maria
- ·全市法院集中兑付农民工工资200余万元
- ·Genesis EV can be charged without a plug
- ·Doosan scraps controversial Robotics
- ·YouTube is more likely to serve problematic videos than useful ones
- ·Elon Musk targets Mars by 2022, and using rockets for Earth travel
- ·Elon Musk wants SpaceX to fly you anywhere on Earth in under an hour
- ·NASA says Earth just had the hottest day ever recorded
- ·US cautious in commenting on NK leader's New Year's Day speech
- ·Everyone is making the same 'Game of Thrones' joke about the iPhone X
- ·Rafael Nadal returns to action
- ·Speeding space object triggered a warning. It wasn't an asteroid.
- ·COVAX cuts all COVID
- ·2023 Cadillac Lyriq: Get a first look at the new luxury electric SUV
- ·How Facebook sound designers gave emoji a voice
- ·NASA's new plan keeps Starliner astronauts in space until 2025
- ·The iPhone 6S is the last of the great iPhones, everything else is trash
- ·Kane 'ready to go' for Champions League final
- ·Ted Cruz just liked a super NSFW tweet and people are cringing so hard
- ·[Herald Review] Tori Kelly thrills fans, hints her love for Korean artists
- ·Apple's next iPhone might be in short supply, at least at first
- ·Bernie Sanders’ DNC speech sounded like everyone else’s. That’s astonishing.
- ·夯实优质服务基础 助推地方经济发展
- ·NSC expresses grave regret over N. Korea's ballistic missile launch
- ·Gigabyte reportedly hit with ransomware attack
- ·Anatomy of a Keyboard
- ·COVAX cuts all COVID
- ·San Juan's mayor isn't happy Republicans canceled a hearing about Hurricane Maria
- ·How Facebook sound designers gave emoji a voice
- ·Speeding space object triggered a warning. It wasn't an asteroid.
- ·OnlyFans' sexually explicit content policy to take effect October 1