What is holding up business bills?
时间:2024-09-22 07:16:59 来源:American news
A negotiation impasse at the National Assembly is proving hard to break, as rival parties refuse to yield their position on provisions embedded in a set of controversial economic bills aimed to relax regulations on business activity.
National Assembly Speaker Chung Ui-hwa (third from right) convenes a meeting of standing committee chairpersons on Tuesday. The NPAD members did not attend. Yonhap
The bills in question are the Service Industry Development Act and Special Act for Boosting Business (both of them provisional names in English). The former was drafted by the government in July 2012 and the latter was coauthored in July 2015 by Rep. Lee Hyun-jae of the ruling Saenuri Party, with the support of 26 of his fellow lawmakers
The Service Act is designed to offer tax benefits and state funding to service-related businesses and their efforts to invest in research and development. The law aims to offer bureaucratic assistance to entrepreneurs who want to build their own service firms and help them expand into overseas markets.
The Special Act, often referred to as a “one-shot act,” aims to simplify related regulations for companies looking to restructure their businesses suffering from an oversupplied market. The bill would provide companies with tax benefits and financial assistance.
Both bills remain stuck in the National Assembly’s relevant committees by the opposition parties. The New Politics Alliance for Democracy, however, has hinted at the possibility of breaking the legislative deadlock if “toxic provisions” were to be revised.
“I think we should not put stigma on the bills before even reviewing them. We should most definitely be engaging in full-fledged negotiations if that can lead to us bridging the gaps and taking toxic clauses out of the bills,” said NPAD lawmaker Rep. Jun Byung-hun last Wednesday. NPAD chairman Moon Jae-in reportedly acknowledged Jun’s remark.
The most contentious provision in the Service Act is Article 2, which defines the scope of the service industry. According to Article 2 of the Service Act, the law shall be applied to any service industry related to economic activities, except for agriculture, fisheries and manufacturing.
The government and ruling Saenuri party assert the bill would create jobs and boost the economy. State-run research organization Korea Development Institute forecast the bill would create up to 690,000 jobs by 2030 and raise the potential economic growth rate by 0.2 to 0.5 percentage points.
The NPAD asserts that since the provision is applicable to “any service industry,” the bill will classify the “medical and health industry” into the service sectors, allowing exemption from government regulations and pave the way for the privatization of the public health care system.
For instance, the liberal parties highlight that deregulation of the medial industry would allow for-profit hospitals to mushroom in Korea, a country that has been touted for its universal health insurance system that enables patients to pay affordable prices to receive medical treatments at big hospitals.
While the NPAD demands the pending bill be revised and “explicitly” stipulate the exemption of the medical and health industry from service sectors in the article that defines the law’s applicability, the Saenuri Party refutes that the bill can “virtually” protect the public health care system without the change.
The Saenuri party cites Article 3, which stipulates that the Medical Service Act supersedes the Service Act. It argues that Medical Act Articles 4, 15, 33 and 49 have provisions that protect the nation’s public health system.
The most debated provision in the “one-shot act” is Article 25, a provision that grants conglomerates an extended period of one year, up from six months, to reorganize their circular shareholding ownership structures and streamline their businesses to comply with regulations.
Though the current law stipulates that companies with assets exceeding 5 trillion won ($4.26 billion) are banned from making circular equity investments in a sister firm, they can do cross shareholdings only when they restructure their business. However, they are required to dispose of the shares within six months.
The government and the ruling party contend that the six-month restriction can force companies to sell off shares at prices cheaper than designated. They also cautioned that the companies might face difficulty securing resources to meet the tight deadline.
But the NPAD argues that such businesses have the capacity to voluntarily or preemptively execute restructuring and that the extension can decrease transparency in management structure and thereby raise the risks of stakeholders, creditors and laborers.
They also point out that the bill could create a loophole for chaebol owners to pass down their assets to their heirs illegally or to achieve control of their business empires despite tiny personal shareholdings, suggesting the conglomerates should be exempt from the law.
The Saenuri Party has refuted this notion, saying the bill would be toothless unless it were applied to the chaebol, who suffer from oversupplied global markets such as steel manufacturing and shipbuilding. The party also highlights that the bill has a provision that prevents chaebol from abusing the legislation.
The law’s Article 10 Clause 4 stipulates that the government can refuse to authorize the corporations’ business reorganization plans if the restructuring is designed to reinforce the conglomerate owners’ business governance or pave the way for passing down the conglomerate to heirs.
By Yeo Jun-suk (jasonyeo@heraldcorp.com)
The bills in question are the Service Industry Development Act and Special Act for Boosting Business (both of them provisional names in English). The former was drafted by the government in July 2012 and the latter was coauthored in July 2015 by Rep. Lee Hyun-jae of the ruling Saenuri Party, with the support of 26 of his fellow lawmakers
The Service Act is designed to offer tax benefits and state funding to service-related businesses and their efforts to invest in research and development. The law aims to offer bureaucratic assistance to entrepreneurs who want to build their own service firms and help them expand into overseas markets.
The Special Act, often referred to as a “one-shot act,” aims to simplify related regulations for companies looking to restructure their businesses suffering from an oversupplied market. The bill would provide companies with tax benefits and financial assistance.
Both bills remain stuck in the National Assembly’s relevant committees by the opposition parties. The New Politics Alliance for Democracy, however, has hinted at the possibility of breaking the legislative deadlock if “toxic provisions” were to be revised.
“I think we should not put stigma on the bills before even reviewing them. We should most definitely be engaging in full-fledged negotiations if that can lead to us bridging the gaps and taking toxic clauses out of the bills,” said NPAD lawmaker Rep. Jun Byung-hun last Wednesday. NPAD chairman Moon Jae-in reportedly acknowledged Jun’s remark.
The most contentious provision in the Service Act is Article 2, which defines the scope of the service industry. According to Article 2 of the Service Act, the law shall be applied to any service industry related to economic activities, except for agriculture, fisheries and manufacturing.
The government and ruling Saenuri party assert the bill would create jobs and boost the economy. State-run research organization Korea Development Institute forecast the bill would create up to 690,000 jobs by 2030 and raise the potential economic growth rate by 0.2 to 0.5 percentage points.
The NPAD asserts that since the provision is applicable to “any service industry,” the bill will classify the “medical and health industry” into the service sectors, allowing exemption from government regulations and pave the way for the privatization of the public health care system.
For instance, the liberal parties highlight that deregulation of the medial industry would allow for-profit hospitals to mushroom in Korea, a country that has been touted for its universal health insurance system that enables patients to pay affordable prices to receive medical treatments at big hospitals.
While the NPAD demands the pending bill be revised and “explicitly” stipulate the exemption of the medical and health industry from service sectors in the article that defines the law’s applicability, the Saenuri Party refutes that the bill can “virtually” protect the public health care system without the change.
The Saenuri party cites Article 3, which stipulates that the Medical Service Act supersedes the Service Act. It argues that Medical Act Articles 4, 15, 33 and 49 have provisions that protect the nation’s public health system.
The most debated provision in the “one-shot act” is Article 25, a provision that grants conglomerates an extended period of one year, up from six months, to reorganize their circular shareholding ownership structures and streamline their businesses to comply with regulations.
Though the current law stipulates that companies with assets exceeding 5 trillion won ($4.26 billion) are banned from making circular equity investments in a sister firm, they can do cross shareholdings only when they restructure their business. However, they are required to dispose of the shares within six months.
The government and the ruling party contend that the six-month restriction can force companies to sell off shares at prices cheaper than designated. They also cautioned that the companies might face difficulty securing resources to meet the tight deadline.
But the NPAD argues that such businesses have the capacity to voluntarily or preemptively execute restructuring and that the extension can decrease transparency in management structure and thereby raise the risks of stakeholders, creditors and laborers.
They also point out that the bill could create a loophole for chaebol owners to pass down their assets to their heirs illegally or to achieve control of their business empires despite tiny personal shareholdings, suggesting the conglomerates should be exempt from the law.
The Saenuri Party has refuted this notion, saying the bill would be toothless unless it were applied to the chaebol, who suffer from oversupplied global markets such as steel manufacturing and shipbuilding. The party also highlights that the bill has a provision that prevents chaebol from abusing the legislation.
The law’s Article 10 Clause 4 stipulates that the government can refuse to authorize the corporations’ business reorganization plans if the restructuring is designed to reinforce the conglomerate owners’ business governance or pave the way for passing down the conglomerate to heirs.
By Yeo Jun-suk (jasonyeo@heraldcorp.com)
-
Best smart home deals this week年终奖来了!从1万到上百万 金融业年终奖大揭秘大熊猫雕塑亮相市区大兴二桥平安养老险推出“一站式企业全福利解决方案”Speeding space object triggered a warning. It wasn't an asteroid.冲围龙 向全国,兴宁“小鸽子”带动“大产业”平安机器阅读理解技术斩获国际竞赛第一名招行“年审贷” 助力小微企业发展!The Weird, Wonderful World of Water Towers宸ュ晢閾惰灏嗕簬2019骞?鏈?鏃ヨ捣瀵逛綑棰濆彉鍔ㄦ彁閱掔煭淇℃湇鍔′环鏍艰繘琛岀浉搴旇皟鏁確涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
相关内容
- ·Expanded police surveillance will get us “broken windows” on steroids.
- ·招商银行发展公募基金业务助客户规避养老风险
- ·这里,是活力魅力雅安!
- ·处罚与宣传并重 雅安交警整治老年代步车乱象
- ·Korea's economy to stop growing without drastic labor change: FKI
- ·2018骞存湪椹梾姣掑寘鏂板瓒?00涓囦釜锛岃吘璁墜鏈虹瀹舵彁閱掔敤鎴疯鎯曟綔鍦ㄥ▉鑳乢涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- ·引进上百优新品种,新平实现柑桔全年供应
- ·银联网联系统成功率达100%
- ·Where to pre
- ·海尔38亿元收购意大利公司 拓展欧洲市场添利器
- ·红色文化旅游宣传活动走进高校
- ·鎷涘晢閾惰鍙戝敭钀岀郴鐔婄尗甯佲€滃ぇ鑴哥尗鈥漘涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- ·PCB official under probe for conflict of interest
- ·粤北粮仓 赏秋胜地
- ·讲授金融风险防范知识 增强投资者自我保护意识
- ·春节国际商品展销会让你买个够 网红产品成最受欢迎年货
最新内容
- ·A Global Tour of Bakeries With Fascinating Histories
- ·橡胶工业设计中心在双星揭牌
- ·闈掑矝9椤圭洰鍏ラ€夆€滆摑鑹茬伯浠撯€濋噸鐐逛笓椤 绔嬮」鏁板叏鍥界涓€
- ·合力攻坚 守护“雅安蓝”
- ·18 Slightly Submerged Architectural Wonders
- ·切实解决市民需求,招商银行青岛分行积极开展“过新年,换新钱”主题活动
- ·闈掑矝9椤圭洰鍏ラ€夆€滆摑鑹茬伯浠撯€濋噸鐐逛笓椤 绔嬮」鏁板叏鍥界涓€
- ·招商银行发展公募基金业务助客户规避养老风险
- ·Ruling bloc divided on foreign nannies' pay
- ·交通银行青岛分行:提高服务意识,做好小面额人民币服务工作
推荐内容
热点内容
- ·广东超一半的北运淡水鱼来自这里!全链发力打响“南海鱼”金字招牌
- ·发展壮大村集体经济 推动乡村振兴
- ·12.4 今日早报 首部《网络评论蓝皮书》发布
- ·租物过年受年轻人青睐 新租赁经济前景广阔仍有隐忧
- ·提前谋划部署准备秋季开学
- ·春节国际商品展销会让你买个够 网红产品成最受欢迎年货
- ·12.4 今日早报 首部《网络评论蓝皮书》发布
- ·涓崕鑰佸瓧鍙 鏁呭杩囧ぇ骞 闈掑矝鍟ら厭棣欓绱鍩 閭€浣犫€滆繘瀹€濊繃骞確涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- ·I Deleted All My Social Accounts: Three Weeks Without Social Media
- ·闈掑矝鑱旈€氬紑灞曡鏀挎潙缃戠粶涓撻」浼樺寲 鎻愬崌缃戠粶鍝佽川