Leonard Leo, Trump’s judge whisperer, promises to take us back to the 1930s.
Recently in Jurisprudence
- Alito’s Explanation for the Upside-Down American Flag Honestly Makes It Worse
- The Judicial Arsonists Went Too Far for the Conservative Justices This Time
- A Key Weakness of Trump’s Defense Is Coming Into View
- Jack Smith Basically Has One Option to Save the Classified Documents Case
One week before the 1980 presidential election, toward the end of his lone debate against Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan stared into the camera and implored Americans to ask themselves, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” The question is widely believed to have ended Carter’s presidency.
Last week, the Washington Post published a profile of Federalist Society Executive Vice President Leonard Leo, focusing in part on a speech he gave to the Council for National Policy in which he warmly predicted the Supreme Court would soon return to the pre–New Deal era of “limited, constitutional government.” Leo believes, in other words, that the court’s view of the Constitution was better off 85 years ago than it is today.
Advertisement“I think we stand at the threshold of an exciting moment in our republic,” Leo told the council at a closed-door meeting in February, audio of which was obtained by the Post. “This is really, I think, at least in recent memory, a newfound embrace of limited constitutional government in our country. I don’t think this has really happened since probably before the New Deal.”
The average American doesn’t know who Leo is, but as the Post piece makes clear, he‘s one of the most influential lawyers in the country. A longtime leader within the Federalist Society, Leo has had Donald Trump’s ear on judicial appointments and has been the main curator of the president’s list of Supreme Court candidates. Two of Leo’s personal picks, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, have been elevated to the highest court in the country since Trump’s election. So when Leonard Leo says he wants to return to a pre–New Deal Constitution, you should listen. And you should be alarmed.
AdvertisementAs Leo knows, constitutional law was very different in the 1930s from what it is today. And in a word, it sucked.
In the 1930s, the courts were fully complicit in maintaining the country as a thoroughgoing ethnocracy, governed openly for the benefit of white men. Public schools in 21 states were racially segregated by law. “Separate but equal” schools had been affirmed by the Supreme Court as late as 1927, in a unanimous decision allowing Mississippi to kick a Chinese American girl out of her local “white” school for being a member of the “yellow” race. The outlawing of segregation is settled law in our country, and nobody would dare dream of returning to those antiquated judicial interpretations, you might say? Several of Trump’s judicial nominees have conspicuously, outrageously, refused to say whether they thought Brown v. Boardof Education, which ended legal school segregation in 1954, was correctly decided.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Leo believes that the court’s view of the Constitution was better off 85 years ago than it is today.In the 1930s, through a combination of discriminatory literacy tests, poll taxes, “good character” requirements, and straight-up violence, less than 1 percent of black people in the Deep South—where they represented more than a third of the population—were registered to vote. The Supreme Court had blessed these intimidation practices for decades, ever since a 1903 decision in which the court said it couldn’t do anything about Alabama’s self-described effort “to establish white supremacy in this state” by refusing to register black voters. Discriminatory voting practices of this sort weren’t banned until the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the most significant provision of which was gutted six years ago in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts (whom Leo also helped elevate to the court).
AdvertisementIn the 1930s, women had no constitutional right to equality. They could legally be kept off juries, given different work hours, paid less money, and imprisoned for using birth control. It would be another four decades before the Supreme Court struck down even a single law for discriminating against women. Kavanaugh and Gorsuch—again, both products of Leo’s vetting—recently dissented from the court’s temporary blocking of a Louisiana law that would have left the entire state with just a single doctor able to perform abortions.
AdvertisementIn the first half of the 20thcentury, the police could beat confessions out of arrestees. Poor defendants had no right to a lawyer. Evidence could be illegally seized and used in prosecutions. In 1944, for example, South Carolina executed a 14-year-old black boy named George Stinney for the murders of two white girls. He was questioned alone, without his parents or a lawyer present, and convicted by an all-white jury after a two-hour trial and 10 minutes of deliberation. He wasn’t allowed to appeal. He had to sit on books to fit into the headpiece of the electric chair. Only in 2014, 70 years too late, did a circuit court judge vacate the 14-year-old Stinney’s murder conviction. The Stinney case tells you all you need to know about criminal justice in the age Leo wants to bring back.
Advertisement AdvertisementThe 1930s was of course the decade of the Great Depression, when unemployment hit 25 percent and most Americans lived in poverty. The post–New Deal court decisions Leo wishes to repudiate are the ones that gave the government the power to enact minimum wage laws, to create unemployment insurance and Social Security, to provide health insurance to the aged and destitute, and to give workers collective bargaining rights. In the 1930s, those too old to work and too poor not to could often expect a quick but painful death. This is the human toll of “limited government.”
If we’re looking for Reagan’s shining city upon a hill, we won’t find it in America’s now-distant past. Not most of us, anyway. And if it’s what Leo is promising us, we can only hope it’s not in America’s future.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
Ruling bloc divided on foreign nannies' pay粽价上涨0.2—1.0元 端午“粽子战”打响Beyoncé graciously shares even more photos from her pregnancy shootKorean Peninsula tensions key topic for Obama's talks with Xi: White HouseThe Analog Embrace: How Some Experiences Are Surviving the Digital AgeNew iPad Pro details leak: 4K over USB推广种草养鹅 促进青年创业Hillary Clinton spent an hour reading her controversial emails at a public art exhibit广州市白云区供销联社携手6所院校15支队伍,加力提速推进“百千万工程”圈养大熊猫野化培训重新启动
下一篇:[Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
- ·Yoon touts pension reform drive amid stagnant popularity rating
- ·Man City into Champions League last 16
- ·Tottenham's problem solving pleases Conte
- ·Prosecutors appeal Blatter, Platini acquittal
- ·Our galaxy might crash into Andromeda. What would happen to Earth?
- ·North Korean leader vows to 'preemptively' contain nuclear threats by hostile forces
- ·节约能源 从点滴做起
- ·Google might be making a Home Hub
- ·两个改造提升项目进入收尾阶段
- ·Tensions mount as record numbers crowd French migrant camp
- ·South Korea asks North Korea to explain fire at Kaesong industrial complex: ministry
- ·Salah downs Man City to give Liverpool lift
- ·How to Backup Your Gmail Account
- ·市生活垃圾压缩处理中转站8月建成
- ·US has no plans to provide COVID vaccine to N. Korea, but supports int'l efforts
- ·Tottenham's problem solving pleases Conte
- ·I Deleted All My Social Accounts: Three Weeks Without Social Media
- ·Apple plans to sell a clear case for the iPhone XR
- ·North Korean leader vows to 'preemptively' contain nuclear threats by hostile forces
- ·Very tired bear holds up bathroom line by napping on the sinks
- ·We Bought the Cheapest DDR5 RAM Modules We Could Find, Are They Any Good?
- ·Swiatek beats Pegula in San Diego
- ·This HTC Vive and HoloLens hack combines VR and AR for true 'mixed reality'
- ·粽价上涨0.2—1.0元 端午“粽子战”打响
- ·Klarna CEO reveals plan to reduce workforce by 50% and replace it with AI
- ·'Idol' contestant besieged by pro
- ·Tesla issues recall for 9,100 Model X cars
- ·New iPad Pro details leak: 4K over USB
- ·Iran returns star footballer Daei's passport
- ·Everyone stop everything: Beyoncé just announced that she's pregnant with twins
- ·Top 10 Tech Pranks
- ·DuckDuckGo, the pro
- ·Korean Peninsula tensions key topic for Obama's talks with Xi: White House
- ·7 February games you should get excited about
- ·If aliens harnessed solar power, could we detect them? NASA investigated.
- ·Korea to build network of smart expressways by 2020