ACLU says ICE and CBP searching electronics violates the Constitution
These days "the border" is used more as an inflammatory concept than an actual place with rules and laws. Now, the ACLU is trying to puncture that hot air with some help from the Constitution.
In preparation for a lawsuit the ACLU is bringing against the federal government, U.S. officials from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had an under-oath chat with the ACLU about how exactly they search electronic devices at the border when they don't have a warrant or "suspicion."
SEE ALSO:Amazon must let shareholders have a say in selling of controversial facial recognition techThe ACLU reports that the testimony was revealing: Agents of these agencies can and do justify searching devices like laptops and cellphones for a variety of nebulous reasons not covered by the actual, ya know, law.
"CBP and ICE are asserting near-unfettered authority to search and seize travelers’ devices at the border, for purposes far afield from the enforcement of immigration and customs laws," the ACLU wrote in a blog post.
ICE and CBP have the authority to search the belongings of people entering the country for contraband, potentially breaking immigration law, and, of course, if they have a warrant. But the ACLU says these agencies are using "the border" as an excuse to skirt the privacy and speech protections enshrined by the Constitution.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the 'border' to make an end run around the Constitution," the ACLU writes. "The border is not a lawless place."
CBP and ICE representatives said that the agencies do not comment on pending litigation. ICE directed Mashable to CBP electronics search and seizure guidelines stating that "CBP searches the electronic devices of fewer than one-hundredth of 1 percent of all arriving international travelers."
"In this digital age, border searches of electronic devices are essential to enforcing the law at the U.S. border and to protecting the American people,” John Wagner, the CBP's deputy executive assistant commissioner, office of field operations, says in the guidelines. “CBP is committed to preserving the civil rights and civil liberties of those we encounter, including the small number of travelers whose devices are searched, which is why the updated Directive includes provisions above and beyond prevailing constitutional and legal requirements."
Beyond this statement by the CBP on its website, the ACLU reported that law enforcement officers admit that they search and seize devices for a host of reasons, which the ACLU says are beyond their direct jurisdiction. To name a few, agents said they will search devices to advance general law enforcement investigations (e.g., bankruptcy), at the request of another agency, or to get information about a contact of the owner of the device.
The ACLU claims these searches violate the first and fourth amendments. The fourth amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure. For something that contains as much personal information as an electronic device, a search would typically require a warrant.
The first amendment protects against freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The ACLU says these searches may cause people to self-censor, so searches violate the first amendment. Additionally, some of the ACLU's clients on behalf of whom it is bringing the lawsuit are journalists. Searches of these individuals' devices — for information on their sources and reporting — might cause them to stop reporting out of fear.
Given these findings, the ACLU is asking the judge in its case to skip the trial and rule on behalf of its clients — U.S. citizens who have experienced unreasonable search and seizure. It wants the judge to send a message, that if a law enforcement officer wants to search a device, they need to get a warrant like everybody else.
UPDATE: May 1, 2019, 12:28 p.m. EDT
This article was updated to include a 'no comment' from ICE, as well as more information about the CBP's stance on electronic search procedures.
Featured Video For You
2018 was the year of the youth activist
下一篇:广东超一半的北运淡水鱼来自这里!全链发力打响“南海鱼”金字招牌
- ·Discover Secret Swimming Holes and Hidden History in Crystal River, Florida
- ·宝兴本土歌曲亮相青海卫视春晚
- ·雨城区沙坪镇下乡慰问送温暖
- ·鸽翅翔动 无法“鸽”舍的情感
- ·Update your BIOS: Utilities from Top Motherboard Makers
- ·你为我们搞建设我们为你送工资
- ·廊桥惊魂 男子翻越围栏掉江 消防官兵涉水救援
- ·1月11日召开市三届人大常委会第8次会议
- ·Garmin Fenix 8 vs. Apple Watch Ultra: The Fenix wins big on battery life
- ·宝兴联社新春送慰问 关怀暖人心
- ·85岁老“八路”抒写“晚晴”受表彰
- ·全力以赴做好岁末年初安全生产工作
- ·中山古镇:到苏炳添家乡看“村BA”,来一场说走就走的美食之旅
- ·全力以赴做好岁末年初安全生产工作
- ·荥经县春风行动“送”岗位400余个 签约200余份
- ·我市150家企业将加盟“四川名优产品网购节”
- ·Swifties for Kamala raises over $100,000 in donations for Harris campaign
- ·汉源县 狮舞花灯陆续上演
- ·万亩梅花盛开,这个周末汕尾陆河邀您共赴一场花海盛宴!
- ·“越古烁今,无我唯茶”
- ·22 Unusual Things You Can Find in the Desert
- ·倾力保供电 川台送锦旗
- ·7天春节假期 全市道路客运安全运送旅客114.94万人次
- ·禅城“模范生”交出“绿美答卷”
- ·DOJ accuses TikTok of collecting and sharing users' personal views, as the app fights a ban
- ·第二届“神木垒冬韵 品味中国西部林海雪原体验游”系列活动将于元旦精彩启幕