First Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down ballot selfie ban in New Hampshire.
Score one for democracy! On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1stCircuit invalidated New Hampshire’s ballot selfie ban, holding that the prohibition on photographing and publicizing one’s ballot violates the First Amendment. Two federal judges have already ruled that ballot selfie bans, which at least 25 states have adopted, violate constitutionally protected freedom of expression. The 1stCircuit’s ruling marks the first time a federal appeals court had ruled on the matter, and the opinion is a resounding victory for both free speech and democracy.
New Hampshire purported to adopt its ballot selfie ban in order to prevent voter fraud and coercion. The sweeping law forbade any citizen from taking “a digital image or photograph of his or her marked ballot and distributing or sharing the image via social media or by any other means.” But the ban did not stop thousands of voters from posting a picture of their ballots on social media, often accompanied with political commentary. So New Hampshire decided to target three voters who posted ballot photographs to Facebook or Twitter, along with text praising or criticizing certain candidates. The voters sued, arguing that the law infringed on their First Amendment rights.
In a unanimous opinion, the 1stCircuit vigorously agreed that the New Hampshire law could not withstand constitutional scrutiny. The court chose to accept that the state really had enacted the law to combat voter fraud, not stifle expression. But the court still found that the statute restricted “core political speech,” and therefore must be “narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest.”
From there, the court easily concluded that the ban was not at all narrowly tailored: There was, instead, “a substantial mismatch between New Hampshire’s objectives and the ballot-selfie prohibition.” The state restricted the rights of every single voter in order to halt the hypothetical wrongdoing of just a few malefactors—without even demonstrating that existing laws against voter fraud were insufficient to address New Hampshire’s concerns. Moreover, the court questioned whether the state’s “abstract interests” in preventing voter fraud could really be “compelling” when the state failed to put forth a single instance of voter coercion in New Hampshire. (The opinion calls such alleged fraud “an unsubstantiated and hypothetical danger.”) Weighing the extreme breadth and chilling effect of the law against its rather meager justifications, the court held that the First Amendment barred such a ban.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement“The restrictions on speech” imposed by New Hampshire’s law, the court concluded, “are antithetical to democratic values.”
What’s most remarkable about the 1stCircuit’s decision is that the judges obviously get it: They understand that, for millennials especially, ballot selfies have become perhaps the primary mode of political expression on Election Day. They amplify voter excitement and might even increase turnout. They are an exercise in two fundamental rights at once—free speech and voting—and help to promote democracy. By providing them with First Amendment protection on Wednesday, the 1stCircuit got it exactly right. Modern technology may have created a raft of truly difficult free speech quandaries. But ballot selfies are not one of them.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
Wordle today: The answer and hints for August 27助“荔”大年,华农特派员团队赴从化开展荔枝种植技术服务Interactive '3D posts' are coming to your Facebook feed心系雅安 江淮汽车向重灾区捐赠20辆车Pressure boost squeezes out more hydrogen from artificial leavesKorea's population to decline after 2032: data手挽手心连心 雨城音乐家协会温情写歌新闻热线传来全国各地关切声雅安市举办首届“文轩教育”校园足球精英夏令营Microsoft literally built treehouses for its employees
- ·Amazon Android Days sale 2024: Save on unlocked phones, tablets, and more
- ·Airbnb renters find hidden camera in vacation condo
- ·BBC correspondent criticizes reports that she called Moon communist
- ·Arrested ex
- ·LG Display starts production of advanced OLED displays for gaming
- ·雨城民兵成功营救高山上的四位老人
- ·Tesla fires hundreds of workers companywide amid production struggles
- ·Ajax's De Ligt joins Juventus for 75 million euros
- ·Where to pre
- ·Snap Map stories show sneak peeks of the Austin, TX Tesla Gigafactory
- ·How to use playlist transfer tools to save your Spotify or Apple Music library
- ·Newt, it takes just a few seconds to proofread a tweet
- ·Wordle today: The answer and hints for August 29
- ·How to use playlist transfer tools to save your Spotify or Apple Music library
- ·The most cringe
- ·Rihanna will soon have a street named after her
- ·'Hyundai Way': Auto giant's W121tr plan aims to seize mobility market lead
- ·Locket app will put your face on your friends' home screen
- ·NK media reports foreign minister's trip to Sweden
- ·In love with your pajamas? Learn how to work from home effectively
- ·N. Korea test
- ·Pogba central to Man United rebuilding plans, says Solskjaer
- ·Seoul: North Korean hackers stole $1.2B in virtual assets
- ·时钟定格在8时2分那一刻
- ·Update your BIOS: Utilities from Top Motherboard Makers
- ·Microsoft literally built treehouses for its employees
- ·夜间献血模式“上线”
- ·下一站,贺江碧道画廊!打开乐山乐水新玩法|暑假去哪玩④
- ·心系雅安 江淮汽车向重灾区捐赠20辆车
- ·江苏立华牧业与广东省农科院动科所深化产学研合作,共筑创新驱动发展新高地
- ·Top 10 Tech Pranks
- ·Kellyanne Conway as Pennywise is everything you’ve ever wanted from 'Saturday Night Live'
- ·Rihanna will soon have a street named after her
- ·Govt. proposal seeks to promote human rights of all people, not just citizens
- ·Speeding space object triggered a warning. It wasn't an asteroid.
- ·Govt. proposal seeks to promote human rights of all people, not just citizens